ifp

Garden Patch Home · Form Definitions

is_a::[[Form Type]] has_status::[[Seed Stage]] in_domain::[[Deep Context Architecture]] in_precinct::[[Garden Precinct]]

Opus Form

Core question: “What am I saying here, how does it connect, and can I prove I said it?”

A compound garden node for the author’s own substantial intellectual works. The lead file contains the work itself – a living document in the author’s voice. Companion files provide self-reflexive analysis, extractable garden insights, and tracking of the work’s various published forms. Grounded in three traditions: FRBR’s Work-Expression-Manifestation hierarchy from library science, IndieWeb’s identity-consolidation patterns, and the principal-agent framework from agency law and Self-Sovereign Identity.

The name “opus” (Latin: work product, plural: opera) connects etymologically to cooperation (from operari, to produce from opus) – the same root that organizes the cooperation-collaboration distinction in the Synpraxis domain.

When to Use Opus Form

An Opus is reserved for substantial intellectual works that merit compound treatment: works you develop, publish, and maintain over time. The test: does this work have its own name, purpose, and ongoing development?

Is an Opus: A book. A substantial essay or article. A presentation with original argument. A pattern language. A specification you authored. A course curriculum.

Is not an Opus: A quick social post. An email reply. A meeting note. A clipping of someone else’s work (use Citation Form). A single pattern within a pattern language (use Pattern Form).

Graduating to Opus: Authored content in Authored/ can graduate to Garden/opuses/ when it warrants compound treatment (analysis, insights, expression tracking). Lighter authored content stays in Authored/.

Recursive Nesting

Opuses nest: a parent Opus can contain child Opuses. A trilogy is an Opus whose children are individual book-Opuses. A blog series may be a parent Opus containing individual article-Opuses. The parent lead file describes the arc and purpose; child Opuses are self-contained compounds within it.

Garden/opuses/[Parent Title]/
  [Parent Title].md               -- parent lead file
  [Child Opus A]/                 -- child compound
    [Child Opus A].md
    analysis.md
    insights.md
    Expressions/
  [Child Opus B]/                 -- child compound

The nesting depth is not limited. A book-Opus within a trilogy-Opus might itself contain chapter-Opuses if they warrant independent treatment.

Compound Structure

[Opus Title]/
  [Opus Title].md                 -- lead file (the work itself)
  analysis.md                     -- self-reflexive analysis
  insights.md                     -- extractable garden nodes
  Expressions/                    -- published venues and forms
    [venue-sidecar].md            -- metadata pointer per publication
  Renditions/                     -- drafts and derived versions
    [draft-or-derivative].md      -- historical or lossy versions
  Archives/                       -- binary source artifacts
    [file].key, .pdf, .pptx       -- gitignored binaries

Lead file: The work itself, in the author’s voice. Free-form structure – the work determines its own sections. Living document: updated, revised, extended over time.

analysis.md: Self-reflexive analysis of the work’s arguments, framework, lineage, limitations. Garden-connected (wikilinks to related nodes). Can be revised when the work evolves substantially (unlike Citation Form’s append-only analysis).

insights.md: Extractable takeaways – concepts, patterns, models, inquiries that could become standalone garden nodes. Maps connections to existing garden domains.

Expressions/: Metadata sidecars tracking where the work is published and in what form. Each sidecar has frontmatter: expresses:, published_at:, published_on:, form: (manifestation, variant), verified:. When an expression has multiple files that must work together (a website with HTML/CSS/JS, a slide deck), place them in a named sub-folder (e.g., Expressions/web/) so the expression is self-contained and functional — you should be able to open index.html and have the site work. The sidecar sits alongside the sub-folder and serves as the manifest (listing which files are published vs. development-only).

Renditions/: Early drafts, abbreviated versions, lossy transformations, archived snapshots of the work at specific points in time. Preserves historical states.

Archives/: Binary artifacts (Keynote files, PDFs, images). Typically gitignored. Referenced by Expression or Rendition sidecars.

Attribution Predicates

Attribution uses role-specific predicates grounded in the principal-agent framework. Predicates capture the CURRENT state of attribution; git history preserves the full record. Roles evolve over time – when a co-author becomes lead author, update the predicates and document the change in the Attribution section.

Required

As Needed

The distinction between authorship and responsibility matters for AI-assisted works: a human may not author a single word yet bears full responsibility as principal. “The augmentation is the method, not the author.”

Other Predicates

Frontmatter

Relationship to Other Forms

Opus presents Patterns: A pattern book (Opus) references garden Pattern Form nodes via presents::. The garden Pattern nodes are the living truth; the Opus captures how the pattern appeared in a specific published Expression.

Opus presents Models: An article that introduces a framework references its garden Model Form node. Multiple Opuses can reference the same Model.

Opus is not Citation: Citation Form captures a dossier ABOUT someone else’s work. Opus Form contains YOUR work itself. The attribution predicates differ: Citation uses cites_work_by:: (third-person); Opus uses authored_by:: and principal:: (first-person).

Opus may contain Cases: A book with case studies can reference garden Case Form nodes. Cases are immutable historical records; the Opus provides narrative context.

SSI and Provenance Layer

Opus Form acknowledges that works can carry verifiable authorship credentials without specifying the mechanism. The principal-agent framework from agency law provides the conceptual foundation. Practical verification may use:

The form definition remains mechanism-agnostic. The SSI layer sits alongside the garden, not inside it.

Open Areas

Exemplars

Category

Structural form – captures what I am saying and how it connects.

Sources

Relations